What key changes has Elon Musk made to Twitter? What has their impact been on users and the platform? Is Elon Musk ruining Twitter?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
After purchasing Twitter for $44 billion, changes Musk has made to Twitter have ruffled the feathers of a broad array of users and compromised the platform\u2019s functionality and long-term viability. The company is now worth less than half of what Musk paid for it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Keep reading for a look at the changes Musk has made and a look at their impact.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Six months ago, Elon Musk bought Twitter<\/a> for $44 billion. Changes he\u2019s made to the app have ruffled the feathers of a broad array of users and compromised the platform\u2019s functionality and long-term viability. The company is now worth <\/strong>less than half<\/strong><\/a> of what Musk paid for it.<\/strong> This left many people are now asking, “Is Elon Musk ruining Twitter?” <\/p>\n\n\n\n Experts say that at the height<\/a> of Twitter\u2019s cultural prominence, between 2015 and 2020, people around the globe turned to the app for breaking news and analysis of any and every conversation of social and political relevance. Twitter\u2019s cultural power and influence were perhaps no more evident than in former president Donald Trump\u2019s unprecedented use of the app to make policy announcements<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n But today, some argue, Twitter has <\/strong>lost its cachet<\/strong><\/a> as the place to be and be heard\u2014destabilized by key changes Elon Musk has made to the platform that reduce its credibility, reliability, and functionality<\/strong>, including the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Change 1: <\/strong>Ranking algorithm adjustment<\/strong><\/a>. Twitter\u2019s primary newsfeed used to offer a balanced mix of tweets from ordinary people, celebrities, and politicians who users voluntarily followed. Today, the app\u2019s default newsfeed promotes an algorithmically-curated stream of tweets from a smaller number of people who users don\u2019t follow<\/strong>\u2014including Musk<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Change 2: Phase out of blue check marks and shift to <\/strong>Twitter Blue<\/strong><\/a>. Twitter used to verify the identities of prominent users with a blue check mark at the top of their profiles. The check mark enabled the Twitter community to distinguish between verified users and people with hoax accounts pretending to be them<\/strong>. This prevented problematic scenarios like someone passing themselves off as the US president, tweeting that they just launched a nuclear missile, and starting World War III.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Musk is now replacing blue check marks with Twitter Blue, a revenue-generating service he hopes will help <\/strong>right the company<\/strong><\/a>. For $8.00 a month, anyone<\/em> can buy a Twitter Blue badge\u2014effectively erasing the identity verification system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Change 3: <\/strong>Content moderation policy dismantling<\/strong><\/a>. Upon taking over Twitter, in the name of free speech, Musk reinstated accounts of users suspended<\/a> and banned<\/a> for harassment, promoting dis- or misinformation, and other behavior fueling hate speech and violence. Musk has shown little commitment to a coherent content moderation policy since then, at times himself tweeting conspiracy theories<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Change 4: Mass layoffs<\/a><\/strong>. To save money, Musk fired 80% of the company\u2019s nearly 8,000-person staff<\/a>, reducing it to a skeletal crew of 1,500.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some argue that Musk has eroded<\/strong> Twitter\u2019s status as the single most important and reliable place to go for breaking news and analysis by: <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Experts further say that Musk\u2019s weak content moderation policies have <\/strong>alienated advertisers<\/strong><\/a>, leading to a 40% revenue drop, by creating a broad perception that users (including Musk), can post <\/strong>racist, sexist, and other damaging speech without penalty<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Finally, users and staff argue that these changes and Musk\u2019s massive workforce reduction have <\/strong>compromised the platform\u2019s functionality<\/strong><\/a> and Twitter\u2019s long-term viability<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some assert that Twitter\u2019s survival in the months ahead depends upon Musk\u2019s ability to build new relationships with advertisers, who historically accounted for 90% of the platform\u2019s revenue<\/a>. But others contend that Musk\u2019s changes have damaged the platform beyond repair<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" What key changes has Elon Musk made to Twitter? What has their impact been on users and the platform? Is Elon Musk ruining Twitter? After purchasing Twitter for $44 billion, changes Musk has made to Twitter have ruffled the feathers of a broad array of users and compromised the platform\u2019s functionality and long-term viability. The company is now worth less than half of what Musk paid for it. Keep reading for a look at the changes Musk has made and a look at their impact.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":65546,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[45,586],"tags":[727],"class_list":["post-101061","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business","category-entertainment","tag-articles","","tg-column-two"],"yoast_head":"\nTwitter<\/strong>‘s History<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
The Impact of Musk\u2019s Changes<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Twitter’s Future<\/h3>\n\n\n\n