{"id":3471,"date":"2026-06-05T23:20:39","date_gmt":"2026-06-05T19:20:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/?p=3471"},"modified":"2026-06-05T23:20:40","modified_gmt":"2026-06-05T19:20:40","slug":"what-is-an-octopus-organization","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/","title":{"rendered":"What Is an Octopus Organization? A New Alternative to a &#8220;Tin Man&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p id=\"h-\">An octopus adapts continuously through distributed intelligence rather than central command. So, what is an &#8220;Octopus Organization&#8221;? It\u2019s a refreshing alternative to companies that are rigid, hollow, and dependent on outside direction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Amazon Web Services strategists Phil Le-Brun and Jana Werner argue that most companies are still built for a world of standardization and control that no longer reflects how work actually gets done. Their book <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/app\/book\/the-octopus-organization\/preview\" rel=\"nofollow\"><em>The Octopus Organization<\/em><\/a> identifies the specific habits that keep companies stuck and gives any leader, at any level, a practical place to start changing. Read on to explore Le-Brun and Werner\u2019s insights into what an Octopus Organization is and the structural pillars that support it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-yoast-seo-table-of-contents yoast-table-of-contents\"><h2>Table of Contents<\/h2><ul><li><a href=\"#h-octopus-organizations-vs-tin-man-organizations\" data-level=\"2\">Octopus Organizations vs. Tin Man Organizations<\/a><ul><li><a href=\"#h-tin-man-organizations\" data-level=\"3\">Tin Man Organizations<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-why-we-need-an-alternative-to-tin-man-organizations\" data-level=\"3\">Why We Need an Alternative to Tin Man Organizations<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-what-octopus-organizations-do-differently\" data-level=\"3\">What Octopus Organizations Do Differently<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-the-3-qualities-of-an-octopus-organization\" data-level=\"3\">The 3 Qualities of an Octopus Organization<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-learn-more-about-octopus-organizations\" data-level=\"2\">Learn More About Octopus Organizations<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-faq\" data-level=\"2\">FAQ<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-octopus-organizations-vs-tin-man-organizations\">Octopus Organizations vs. Tin Man Organizations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Have you ever felt like a cog in a machine? Le-Brun and Werner explain that, <strong>for most of the 20th century, organizations were designed to resemble machines<\/strong>. In their book, they contrast these \u201cTin Man Organizations&#8221; with \u201cOctopus Organizations.\u201d They detail what an Octopus Organization is\u2014and make the case for why it&#8217;s a better way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(Shortform note: Le-Brun and Werner are executive strategists at Amazon Web Services with experience leading large-scale organizational change\u2014Le-Brun as the former international CIO of McDonald\u2019s and Werner as a leader of corporate transformations across Europe. Drawing on that experience and on extensive interviews with executives across industries, they identify dysfunctions [which they call \u201cantipatterns\u201d] that keep companies stuck.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-tin-man-organizations\">Tin Man Organizations<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>When your goal is to manufacture consistent products, provide a standardized service, or produce predictable results, variation is a liability. So the right model is hierarchical and standardized\u2014one with clear roles, defined processes, and decisions made at the top and executed below. Le-Brun and Werner call companies that follow this model \u201cTin Man Organizations,\u201d borrowing the name of a character in L. Frank Baum\u2019s 1900 novel <em>The Wizard of Oz <\/em>who was rigid, hollow, and reliant on others\u2019 instructions. The authors point out that this model was genuinely well-suited to its era.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(Shortform note: In Baum\u2019s novel, the Tin Woodman is a human woodcutter who <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jackcheng.com\/sunday\/327-tin-men-and-unintended-symbols\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">falls under a witch\u2019s curse<\/a> and is rebuilt by a tinsmith, one part at a time, until no trace of the original remains. In Henry Littlefield\u2019s 1964 analysis [the most influential scholarly reading of the book], this makes him <a href=\"https:\/\/americanhistory.si.edu\/explore\/stories\/populism-and-world-oz\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">a symbol of the industrial laborer<\/a>\u2014not the machine, but <a href=\"https:\/\/turnmeondeadman.com\/the-wizard-of-oz-as-a-parable-on-populism-part-1\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">the person the machine consumed<\/a>. Fritz Lang\u2019s 1927 film <em>Metropolis<\/em> illustrates the same idea on a larger scale. It depicts a city with <a href=\"https:\/\/midwestfilmjournal.com\/2025\/09\/05\/fritz-on-fridays-metropolis-1927\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">thinkers in towers above<\/a> and workers tending machinery below ground. No worker makes a decision\u2014they follow the rhythm of the clock and the machine\u2014and the <a href=\"http:\/\/thenation.com\/article\/society\/metropolis-workers-class-uprising\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">roles of \u201chead\u201d and \u201chands\u201d<\/a> have been assigned to entirely different groups of people.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-why-we-need-an-alternative-to-tin-man-organizations\">Why We Need an Alternative to Tin Man Organizations<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>To understand why many organizations need to move beyond the top-down structure, it&#8217;s important to understand <strong>the distinction between <em>complicated<\/em> and <em>complex<\/em> problems<\/strong>. The traditional model created organizations that thrived in what Le-Brun and Werner call a \u201ccomplicated\u201d world, one where solving problems was like building an engine. However intricate the system (with thousands of interlocking parts), every process was knowable, repeatable, and fundamentally predictable. If something broke, you identified the faulty component and fixed it. Complicated problems reward analysis, specialization, and control\u2014and traditional organizations excelled at providing exactly those capabilities at scale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The problem is that <strong>most organizations now operate in a world better described as <em>complex<\/em><\/strong>. It\u2019s dynamic and interconnected\u2014a small change in one place produces ripple effects that no model can predict. Le-Brun and Werner note that new technologies quickly reshape industries, customer expectations shift in ways that resist prediction, and the work that many organizations do has become much more relational. In such complex environments, the features that made the traditional model effective become liabilities: Rigid structures can\u2019t flex, centralized decision-making can\u2019t respond quickly enough to what\u2019s happening at the edges, and standardized processes can\u2019t accommodate the variation that complex problems demand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Separating Thinking From Doing<\/strong><br><br>The traditional model wasn\u2019t how organizations inevitably <em>evolved<\/em>, but the way someone <em>designed<\/em> them. That someone was Frederick Winslow Taylor, a 19th-century engineer who believed there was one optimal way to perform any task. His \u201cscientific management\u201d system broke every job into measurable steps, separated planning from execution, and concentrated decision-making at the top. This creates the kind of tight controls and external incentives that Daniel Pink argues in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/app\/book\/drive\/1-page-summary\" rel=\"nofollow\"><em>Drive<\/em><\/a> work well for routine, repetitive tasks\u2014such as those that were the bread and butter of the workplaces Taylor studied. Taylor\u2019s model worked in the world he lived in, but the world has changed in two significant ways.<br><br>The first affects the nature of work itself: Pink shows that algorithmic, assembly-line jobs have been outsourced or automated, and what remains requires judgment and creativity\u2014qualities Taylor\u2019s system suppresses. The second change has occurred in the work environment. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/app\/book\/team-of-teams\" rel=\"nofollow\"><em>Team of Teams<\/em><\/a>, Stanley McChrystal describes how the US military\u2019s task force in Iraq, built on Taylor\u2019s principles, was outmaneuvered by a decentralized adversary. The problem? Taylor\u2019s system separates <em>thinking<\/em> from <em>doing<\/em>. That works when you can reliably anticipate reality\u2014but not when you\u2019re in an environment Le-Brun and Werner would call <em>complex<\/em>, where the people closest to the action are best positioned to see what happens and respond.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-what-octopus-organizations-do-differently\">What Octopus Organizations Do Differently<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The octopus evolved for exactly this kind of complex environment<\/strong>. It has a central brain, but much of its nervous system is distributed through its arms, each of which is capable of sensing and responding to its surroundings independently while still coordinating with the whole. An octopus can also reshape itself to move through any space, change its appearance to camouflage itself, and adjust its behavior based on what it encounters. Le-Brun and Werner argue that this is the model modern organizations need\u2014<strong>not machines optimized for a fixed task, but living systems capable of adaptation<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>How an Octopus\u2019s Intelligence Really Works<\/strong><br><br>For any organization trying to distribute intelligence, the question is this: What does the center contribute, and what do the edges handle? Octopus neuroscience offers one answer. An octopus has 500 million neurons, but the central brain claims fewer than one in 10 of them. Two-thirds are distributed across its arms, and the rest are in its optic lobes. While a human motor cortex <a href=\"https:\/\/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC5368235\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">maintains a precise internal model<\/a> of where each of our limbs are in space, the octopus brain <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0960982212010640\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">has no such model<\/a>. Instead of choreographing movements, it issues a mission\u2014hunt, hide, or navigate\u2014and leaves it to the arms to explore and share information with each other through an arm-to-arm channel that the central brain <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2019\/06\/190625102420.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">doesn\u2019t appear to have access to<\/a>.<br><br>But the arms aren\u2019t solely <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oist.jp\/news-center\/news\/2020\/10\/29\/do-octopuses-arms-have-mind-their-own\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">dependent on their own learning<\/a>. Scientists have found that, when octopuses are trained on a task using one arm, they can transfer that knowledge to arms that weren\u2019t involved in the training, meaning the distributed system works <em>because<\/em> of what the center holds in common, not <em>despite<\/em> it. Le-Brun and Werner argue that a shared sense of what an organization is working toward makes a similar, group-level distributed intelligence possible. As in the octopus brain, the contribution of a leader in an Octopus Organization is to set the agenda, and that shared agenda is what keeps the arms working <em>together<\/em>, not at cross-purposes.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The contrast between traditional organizations and Octopus Organizations is clearly visible in how they operate<\/strong>. For example, in a traditional strategy meeting, prepared slides are presented in sequence and questions have to wait until the end; the room is meant for the consumption of information, not the creation of new ideas. In the same kind of meeting at an Octopus Organization, a diverse group of people (perhaps frontline workers and executives alike) pitch ideas and challenge each other\u2019s thinking. Likewise, where a traditionally structured company treats innovation as the job of a dedicated department, an Octopus Organization treats it as the daily work of every team.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>How to Close the Gap Between Permission and Participation<\/strong><br><br>It\u2019s easy to assume that, once you create the opportunity by inviting diverse voices into the room or telling everyone that innovation is their job, participation will follow. But two prerequisites\u2014genuine comprehension and psychological safety\u2014determine whether it actually does, and the first is harder to create than it looks.<br><br>In a typical meeting, a presenter might work through a series of slides while others follow along, but Colin Bryar and Bill Carr explain in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/app\/book\/working-backwards\" rel=\"nofollow\"><em>Working Backwards<\/em><\/a> that slides can only convey basic ideas, and passively following along doesn\u2019t create the depth of understanding that people need so they can build on each other\u2019s thinking. Amazon\u2019s fix is to start each meeting in silence, with everyone reading a detailed memo at their own pace. That way, when discussion begins, people can truly engage with a topic rather than just reacting to the presenter.<br><br>The same logic applies to innovation. Asking everyone to treat innovation as part of their everyday work also asks them to take interpersonal risks such as sharing half-formed ideas, challenging existing practices, and running experiments that might fail. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/app\/book\/teaming\" rel=\"nofollow\"><em>Teaming<\/em><\/a>, Harvard researcher Amy C. Edmondson explains that the condition that makes people willing to take those risks is psychological safety\u2014the belief that speaking up or admitting mistakes won\u2019t result in embarrassment or punishment. Without a work environment that creates a genuine sense that these risks are safe to take, people protect themselves by withholding ideas rather than sharing them.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Le-Brun and Werner observe that traditional organizations tend to concentrate intelligence at the top, while Octopus Organizations distribute it throughout. But distributing intelligence matters only insofar as it brings decision-making closer to the people best positioned to understand and serve customers. A single organizing question\u2014<strong><em>Does this create more value for our customers?<\/em><\/strong>\u2014is the test against which every Octopus Organization behavior needs to be measured.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(Shortform note: Distributing decisions and treating customer value as something every action must enhance are two ideas that together produced Agile\u2014an approach to management that emphasizes incremental progress and close collaboration. Jeff Sutherland\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/app\/book\/scrum\" rel=\"nofollow\"><em>Scrum<\/em><\/a> [Agile\u2019s most widely adopted implementation], organizes work into short cycles called Sprints that begin by asking how the planned work will increase customer value and end with a demonstration where customers give feedback. But, even with these tools in place, it\u2019s not easy to follow through. Companies that adopt Scrum often get the practices right without distributing real decision-making authority or letting customer feedback genuinely change their course.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-the-3-qualities-of-an-octopus-organization\">The 3 Qualities of an Octopus Organization<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Le-Brun and Werner explain that an Octopus Organization cultivates three qualities:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>clarity\u2014a common purpose and priorities<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>ownership\u2014genuine agency over the work<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>curiosity\u2014the drive to continuously learn and adapt<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>When conditions are unpredictable, organizations need people to exercise judgment\u2014to sense what\u2019s happening, decide what matters, and act without waiting for direction. <strong>Complex environments demand clarity, ownership, and curiosity<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this section, I\u2019ll examine each of these qualities in turn, exploring what each one requires, how organizations typically fall short, and what Octopus Organizations do instead. The authors call the recurring habits that undermine these qualities \u201cantipatterns\u201d\u2014conditioned organizational responses that feel sensible in the moment but that consistently produce bad outcomes. The book identifies 36 of these, organized under the three foundational qualities; the following sections walk through the most instructive examples of each.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-quality-1-clarity\">Quality #1: Clarity<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Clarity means that everyone in an organization knows what they\u2019re working toward, why it matters, and what success looks like<\/strong>. This sounds straightforward, but Le-Brun and Werner find that organizations consistently overestimate how much clarity they\u2019ve actually created. Here\u2019s a quick test: If you asked five members of your leadership team to independently write down the organization\u2019s top three priorities and who\u2019s accountable for each, would they give you the same answers? In most organizations, they wouldn\u2019t. Research by organizational expert Daniel Coyle found that only 2% of employees could accurately describe their company\u2019s purpose\u2014despite 64% of executives believing they had communicated it clearly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(Shortform note: The gap Coyle describes might be harder to close than it first appears, and not only because leaders communicate poorly. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/app\/book\/the-culture-code\" rel=\"nofollow\"><em>The Culture Code<\/em><\/a>, Coyle argues that a genuine shared sense of purpose is actually the <em>third<\/em> thing a healthy organization develops, not the first. That\u2019s because it depends on two prior conditions: safety [the same psychological safety that Amy Edmondson describes in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/app\/book\/teaming\" rel=\"nofollow\"><em>Teaming<\/em><\/a>] and vulnerability [the willingness to admit uncertainty and ask for help]. When those conditions are missing, even clear communication doesn\u2019t fully land, and the gap between what leadership thinks it has communicated and what people have actually absorbed stays invisible.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-how-tin-man-organizations-fail-on-clarity\">How Tin Man Organizations Fail on Clarity<\/h5>\n\n\n\n<p>The most common way organizations undermine clarity is through language. Their mission statements may be packed with phrases such as \u201cdelivering stakeholder value\u201d or \u201cbecoming the best\u201d\u2014words that sound meaningful in a boardroom but don\u2019t help anyone decide what to work on or what to say no to. Without this clarity, even talented, motivated people can\u2019t make good decisions because they lack the context to know what \u201cgood\u201d means in their situation. The problem usually isn\u2019t deliberate vagueness. <strong>When an organization struggles to articulate its purpose in plain language, it almost always signals a genuine absence of agreement at the top.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(Shortform note: Experts agree with Le-Brun and Werner that the language problem\u2014mission statements packed with words such as \u201cpassion\u201d and \u201cinnovation\u201d that sound meaningful but don\u2019t help anyone decide what to work on\u2014is more than a communication failure. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/app\/book\/good-strategy-bad-strategy\" rel=\"nofollow\"><em>Good Strategy Bad Strategy<\/em><\/a>, Richard Rumelt calls this kind of language \u201cfluff\u201d and explains where it typically comes from. Making an actual strategic choice means favoring some priorities over others, which means disappointing specific people with real power. Rather than choosing, many leadership teams fall back on language so vague that it lets them accommodate everyone\u2019s vision simultaneously.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The same problem of failing to commit to a clear direction shows up in strategy. <strong>Many organizations try to pursue too many things at once, producing plans so broad they could belong to almost anyone in their industry and that describe what any competitor might aspire to. <\/strong>Le-Brun and Werner suggest a test: Remove your company\u2019s name from a recent strategy document and replace it with a rival\u2019s. If the document still makes sense, the strategy isn\u2019t genuinely yours; it doesn\u2019t reflect specific choices about where to compete and, crucially, where <em>not<\/em> to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Metrics present a related trap. <\/strong>When hitting a number becomes the goal, people find ways to hit it regardless of whether doing so advances the organization\u2019s actual aims. For example, a tailor shop that measures success by how many alterations its tailors complete each week will see high output. But a quickly hemmed pair of trousers that doesn\u2019t fit the customer properly isn\u2019t a success, and a customer who has to return to have their pants hemmed a second time hasn\u2019t been well served. <strong>Octopus Organizations treat measurement as a tool for learning rather than a scoreboard<\/strong>, regularly asking whether what they track still tells them something useful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(Shortform note: Optimizing a number without advancing the real goal is only one version of the metrics trap. John Doerr\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/app\/book\/measure-what-matters\" rel=\"nofollow\"><em>Measure What Matters<\/em><\/a> points to another: measuring the wrong thing. YouTube spent years tracking clicks, views, and revenue until its team stopped to ask what they actually cared about and realized the answer was how much time people spent genuinely watching videos. Before, they\u2019d never questioned whether the system was measuring the right thing at all. To guard against both failures, Doerr recommends <strong>pairing every volume metric with a quality counterpart<\/strong>\u2014\u201ccomplete 10 alterations per day\u201d alongside \u201creceive no returns for poor fit\u201d\u2014which makes it harder to hit a number at the expense of what it\u2019s meant to represent.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-quality-2-ownership\">Quality #2: Ownership<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Ownership, the second quality of an Octopus Organization, means <strong>having genuine agency over your work<\/strong>\u2014<strong>the ability to make real decisions, take initiative, and be accountable for outcomes<\/strong>, not just to execute a predefined task. Le-Brun and Werner argue that this is the natural human state. Children don\u2019t need to be encouraged to explore, take initiative, or claim mastery over their environment. What organizations manage to do (often without realizing it) is train that instinct out of people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-how-tin-man-organizations-fail-on-ownership\">How Tin Man Organizations Fail on Ownership<\/h5>\n\n\n\n<p>The most fundamental barrier to ownership is the fear that speaking up will cost you something. You can spot this in meetings where people wait to see which way the most senior person is leaning before sharing their own view, raising concerns only afterward in the hallway. Le-Brun and Werner note that this happens even when leaders invite candor because people\u2019s experience has taught them what typically happens when someone states an uncomfortable truth. <strong>Building ownership requires creating conditions where people believe that speaking up won\u2019t put their reputation or job at risk. <\/strong>Leaders do this by admitting what they don\u2019t know, treating mistakes as material for learning, and demonstrating that they want to hear bad news.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>A second, more structural barrier is the proliferation of approval processes<\/strong>. In most organizations, blocking a decision carries less personal risk than approving one, which creates an incentive for cautious behavior that slows everything down. Le-Brun and Werner describe an insurance company whose promising new product feature was reviewed by legal, marketing, security, and the CEO before stalling entirely\u2014all while a competitor launched first. The fix isn\u2019t to abandon oversight but to be judicious about whether you need <em>gates<\/em> (checkpoints where someone can simply say no) or <em>guardrails<\/em> (boundaries that define what teams are free to do without asking permission).&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Perhaps the most important question ownership raises is a simple one: <strong>Does anyone actually own this outcome<\/strong>, not as a task or a section of a presentation, but the result itself? Le-Brun and Werner argue that most organizations have plenty of people attending meetings, offering input, and providing partial approvals without designating anyone who is fully, personally accountable for making something happen. They call the people who would fill this role \u201csingle-threaded leaders\u201d\u2014people with genuine decision-making authority, a clear remit, and a real stake in the result. <strong>Creating a culture of ownership in an Octopus Organization means designing roles so that accountability is genuine, not merely declared<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-quality-3-curiosity\">Quality #3: Curiosity<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Curiosity, the third quality of Octopus Organizations, is the drive to ask questions, test assumptions, and update your understanding of what\u2019s true\u2014even when the answers are inconvenient. <strong>Curiosity allows an organization to keep learning as its environment changes, rather than doubling down on what used to work. <\/strong>Le-Brun and Werner argue that organizations talk about valuing curiosity more often than they reward it. Research cited in the book found that twice as many organizations claim to cultivate a culture of curiosity as actually practice one\u2014the gap between what organizations <em>say<\/em> and what they <em>incentivize<\/em> tends to be widest exactly where curiosity matters most.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-how-tin-man-organizations-fail-on-curiosity\">How Tin Man Organizations Fail on Curiosity<\/h5>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The clearest example of how well organizations foster curiosity is how they handle failure. <\/strong>When failure is treated as something to be hidden or survived rather than examined, teams do exactly what you\u2019d expect\u2014they prop up failing projects, obscure setbacks from leadership, and avoid running experiments that might produce the wrong answer. The result is that organizations accumulate large, expensive failures rather than small, informative ones. <strong>Octopus Organizations change this by framing initiatives as experiments where the goal isn\u2019t to succeed on the first try\u2014but to learn what\u2019s true as quickly and cheaply as possible<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(Shortform note: The shift Le-Brun and Werner describe\u2014from protecting failing projects to learning from them\u2014depends on a design decision that\u2019s easy to overlook: A useful experiment has to be <em>capable <\/em>of failing. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/app\/book\/the-lean-startup\" rel=\"nofollow\"><em>The Lean Startup<\/em><\/a>, Eric Ries argues that a hypothesis earns the name only if it makes specific, observable predictions\u2014predictions that could turn out to be wrong. An experiment designed to confirm what you already believe isn\u2019t an experiment; it\u2019s confirmation bias with extra steps, and it produces the same large, expensive failures as no experiment at all. Under Ries\u2019s framework, <strong>a negative result isn\u2019t failure; it\u2019s data<\/strong>. It tells you something true about your assumptions before you\u2019ve committed further resources.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Curiosity also demands something counterintuitive\u2014the willingness to tackle the hardest and most uncertain part of a project first<\/strong>. A founder who spends her first year perfecting a product before testing whether anyone will pay for it has done the <em>easier<\/em> thing before the <em>essential<\/em> one. She skipped the question she needed to answer first: <em>Will anyone want this, and at this price?<\/em> Le-Brun and Werner describe this as a common failure. Teams gravitate toward tasks they already know how to do, building the impressive and visible parts of a project, while deferring the test that would reveal whether the whole thing is even worthwhile. <strong>Octopus Organizations counter this by identifying the riskiest assumption in any project and testing it first<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Amazon formalizes this through a practice called \u201cWorking Backwards.\u201d Before committing resources to building anything, teams write a mock press release describing the finished product as if it already exists. The exercise forces clarity about whom the product is for, what problem it solves, and why a customer would care. <strong>This kind of distributed curiosity is also what produces genuine innovation<\/strong>. Many organizations miss the connection, treating innovation as a dedicated function confined to a lab, assigned to particular people, or subject to a formal process. By designating specific people to innovate on behalf of everyone else, they inadvertently communicate that the job of most employees is execution, not exploration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Why You Need to Ask the Hard Question Before You\u2019re Invested in the Answer<\/strong><br><br>When you work on the comfortable parts of a project first, that creates momentum. Momentum makes the harder questions about your initial assumptions feel more threatening to ask\u2014and more like a verdict on everything you\u2019ve already invested. Both Amazon\u2019s \u201cWorking Backwards\u201d practice and Le-Brun and Werner\u2019s advice to challenge the riskiest assumption first are designed to prevent this problem; they force you to tackle what you\u2019re most uncertain about before you have anything to protect.<br><br>Teams at NASA have a similar process for embracing uncertainty early in a project. Before engineers begin designing a spacecraft, the people who will operate the mission are asked to write out <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/epet302\/chapter\/2-5-products-of-design-reference-missions\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">what a successful mission looks like<\/a>\u2014not to provide engineering specs, but to give a plain account of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/reference\/4-2-technical-requirements-definition\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">what needs to happen<\/a> from launch through every stage of the mission until it achieves its objective. The idea is that, if the engineers can\u2019t yet describe what success looks like from the perspective of the person doing the work, they shouldn\u2019t start building toward it.<br><br>Ozan Varol explains in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/app\/book\/think-like-a-rocket-scientist\" rel=\"nofollow\"><em>Think Like a Rocket Scientist<\/em><\/a> that NASA applies the same principle once a spacecraft is built, too. Rather than building a spacecraft and hoping it survives conditions in space, engineers put the hardware through those conditions\u2014vacuum, thermal extremes, the violence of launch\u2014before anything leaves the ground. The goal is to find out what breaks while breaking it is still a solvable problem. This is why both practices enable more innovative design: When you know that failure will be caught early and cheaply (rather than causing catastrophe), you can create and test more ambitious ideas.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Le-Brun and Werner argue that innovation labs consistently disappoint because they structurally separate innovation from the everyday customer observations that drive it. Amazon Prime began out of one engineer\u2019s observation about how customers were experiencing shipping, not as a strategic initiative. It emerged because someone close to the work was paying attention and had the space to act on what they noticed. <strong>An Octopus Organization that values curiosity gives everyone the tools and permission to surface problems, test ideas, and make improvements\u2014because these processes are where most of the best ideas actually come from<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(Shortform note: Some experts suggest that innovation labs fail, not because separating them from other parts of the business is wrong, but because separation without communication is a dead end. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/app\/book\/loonshots\" rel=\"nofollow\"><em>Loonshots<\/em><\/a><em>,<\/em> Safi Bahcall calls this \u201cthe PARC trap\u201d after Xerox\u2019s Palo Alto Research Center, which developed innovations that went on to define modern computing\u2014none of which Xerox brought to market. The distance between the lab and the core business wasn\u2019t the problem; it was that there was no feedback loop to connect them. This suggests that a dedicated innovation team can work, but only if it\u2019s actively paired with exchange between the people developing ideas and the people closest to customers.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-learn-more-about-octopus-organizations\">Learn More About Octopus Organizations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>To better understand what an Octopus Organization is and how to create one, read Phil Le-Brun and Jana Werner\u2019s book <em>The Octopus Organization<\/em> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/app\/book\/the-octopus-organization\/preview\" rel=\"nofollow\">Shortform\u2019s comprehensive guide to it<\/a>. We provide analysis, connections to ideas from other leading business thinkers, and an exercise to help you apply the book&#8217;s principles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-faq\">FAQ<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>What is an Octopus Organization?<\/strong> An Octopus Organization is a company that distributes intelligence, decision-making, and ownership throughout its workforce rather than concentrating them at the top. Like an octopus, whose arms can sense and respond to their environment independently, these organizations empower people closest to the work to act without waiting for central direction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>What is a Tin Man Organization?<\/strong> A Tin Man Organization is a traditionally structured, hierarchical company built for standardization and control\u2014rigid, hollow, and dependent on top-down direction. The term comes from Phil Le-Brun and Jana Werner&#8217;s book <em>The Octopus Organization<\/em>, borrowing the character from <em>The Wizard of Oz<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>What are the three qualities of an Octopus Organization?<\/strong> Le-Brun and Werner identify clarity (a shared sense of purpose and priorities), ownership (genuine agency over one&#8217;s work), and curiosity (the drive to continuously learn and adapt).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>What kinds of problems do Octopus Organizations solve better?<\/strong> They excel in complex, unpredictable environments where conditions shift rapidly and the people closest to customers are best positioned to respond\u2014as opposed to complicated but predictable problems, where traditional hierarchical models still work well.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An Octopus Organization lets those closest to the work act without waiting for central direction. See how an octopus is better than a Tin Man.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":3484,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[20,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3471","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business","category-leadership"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.3 (Yoast SEO v24.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>What Is an Octopus Organization? A New Alternative to a &quot;Tin Man&quot; - Shortform Hub<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"An Octopus Organization lets those closest to the work act without waiting for central direction. See how an octopus is better than a Tin Man.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"What Is an Octopus Organization? A New Alternative to a &quot;Tin Man&quot;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"An Octopus Organization lets those closest to the work act without waiting for central direction. See how an octopus is better than a Tin Man.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Shortform Hub\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-05T19:20:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-05T19:20:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/octopus-organization-illustration.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"571\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Elizabeth Whitworth\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Elizabeth Whitworth\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"20 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/\",\"name\":\"What Is an Octopus Organization? A New Alternative to a \\\"Tin Man\\\" - Shortform Hub\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/octopus-organization-illustration.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-05T19:20:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-05T19:20:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/#\/schema\/person\/d2928cf6c11a69ced1491d6a5b74fb13\"},\"description\":\"An Octopus Organization lets those closest to the work act without waiting for central direction. See how an octopus is better than a Tin Man.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/\"]}],\"accessibilityFeature\":[\"tableOfContents\"]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/octopus-organization-illustration.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/octopus-organization-illustration.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":571,\"caption\":\"A drawing of an octopus highlighting clarity, ownership, and curiosity illustrates what an Octopus Organization is\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Professional Life\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/category\/professional\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Leadership &amp; Management\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/category\/professional\/leadership\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"What Is an Octopus Organization\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/\",\"name\":\"Shortform Hub\",\"description\":\"Where Meaningful Ideas Come Together\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/#\/schema\/person\/d2928cf6c11a69ced1491d6a5b74fb13\",\"name\":\"Elizabeth Whitworth\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1fff9d65a52ac4340660218e7b63ee5e365cf08e7aa7adff79a0142cd4b96f84?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1fff9d65a52ac4340660218e7b63ee5e365cf08e7aa7adff79a0142cd4b96f84?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Elizabeth Whitworth\"},\"description\":\"Elizabeth has a lifelong love of books. She devours nonfiction, especially in the areas of history, theology, and philosophy. A switch to audiobooks has kindled her enjoyment of well-narrated fiction, particularly Victorian and early 20th-century works. She appreciates idea-driven books\u2014and a classic murder mystery now and then. Elizabeth has a Substack and is writing a book about what the Bible says about death and hell.\",\"sameAs\":[\"rina@shortform.com\"],\"award\":[\"Contributions to joint task force efforts (FBI)\",\"Contributions to Special Operations Division (DOJ & DEA)\",\"Efforts to fight the war on drugs (NSA)\",\"Contributions to Operation Storm Front (US Customs Service)\"],\"knowsAbout\":[\"History\",\"Theology\",\"Government\"],\"jobTitle\":\"Senior SEO Writer\",\"worksFor\":\"Shortform\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/author\/elizabeth\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"What Is an Octopus Organization? A New Alternative to a \"Tin Man\" - Shortform Hub","description":"An Octopus Organization lets those closest to the work act without waiting for central direction. See how an octopus is better than a Tin Man.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"What Is an Octopus Organization? A New Alternative to a \"Tin Man\"","og_description":"An Octopus Organization lets those closest to the work act without waiting for central direction. See how an octopus is better than a Tin Man.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/","og_site_name":"Shortform Hub","article_published_time":"2026-06-05T19:20:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-05T19:20:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":571,"url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/octopus-organization-illustration.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Elizabeth Whitworth","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Elizabeth Whitworth","Est. reading time":"20 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/","name":"What Is an Octopus Organization? A New Alternative to a \"Tin Man\" - Shortform Hub","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/octopus-organization-illustration.jpg","datePublished":"2026-06-05T19:20:39+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-05T19:20:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/#\/schema\/person\/d2928cf6c11a69ced1491d6a5b74fb13"},"description":"An Octopus Organization lets those closest to the work act without waiting for central direction. See how an octopus is better than a Tin Man.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/"]}],"accessibilityFeature":["tableOfContents"]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/octopus-organization-illustration.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/octopus-organization-illustration.jpg","width":1200,"height":571,"caption":"A drawing of an octopus highlighting clarity, ownership, and curiosity illustrates what an Octopus Organization is"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/professional\/leadership\/what-is-an-octopus-organization\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Professional Life","item":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/category\/professional\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Leadership &amp; Management","item":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/category\/professional\/leadership\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"What Is an Octopus Organization"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/","name":"Shortform Hub","description":"Where Meaningful Ideas Come Together","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/#\/schema\/person\/d2928cf6c11a69ced1491d6a5b74fb13","name":"Elizabeth Whitworth","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1fff9d65a52ac4340660218e7b63ee5e365cf08e7aa7adff79a0142cd4b96f84?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1fff9d65a52ac4340660218e7b63ee5e365cf08e7aa7adff79a0142cd4b96f84?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Elizabeth Whitworth"},"description":"Elizabeth has a lifelong love of books. She devours nonfiction, especially in the areas of history, theology, and philosophy. A switch to audiobooks has kindled her enjoyment of well-narrated fiction, particularly Victorian and early 20th-century works. She appreciates idea-driven books\u2014and a classic murder mystery now and then. Elizabeth has a Substack and is writing a book about what the Bible says about death and hell.","sameAs":["rina@shortform.com"],"award":["Contributions to joint task force efforts (FBI)","Contributions to Special Operations Division (DOJ & DEA)","Efforts to fight the war on drugs (NSA)","Contributions to Operation Storm Front (US Customs Service)"],"knowsAbout":["History","Theology","Government"],"jobTitle":"Senior SEO Writer","worksFor":"Shortform","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/author\/elizabeth\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/octopus-organization-illustration.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3471","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3471"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3471\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3525,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3471\/revisions\/3525"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3484"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/hub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}